Monday, October 13, 2008

Which should come first, the book or the movie?

Can the movie ever be as good as the book?

I wanted to read The Watchmen before the movie comes out in March 2009. When I was reading an early review of the movie, however, the reviewer wishes he could have seen the movie with a fresh pair of eyes in order to judge it on its own merits. I think this raises a good question: do you prefer to watch the movie first, or read the book? It is my belief that no movie can ever compete with the depth and grandeur of a good book, so I like to read the book first. I don’t like to have the actors’ faces or gestures in my head to spoil it for my imagination. But then the movie really never is better, just a weak copy. If you watch the movie then read the book, maybe both can be equally enjoyable in their own way. Maybe the best situation is when you go see a movie and don’t realize it’s a book, then find out about the book later. What do you think?

3 comments:

  1. Good question. I like books first better because I agree that I don't like picturing the actors faces when I read the book.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I like books first. I love words and their power is diminished for me if the picture is already painted. Altho--a possible exception would be No Country For Old Men. The book was even better the second time after watching the stunning performances in the movie.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks for the comments! I guess a lot of people prefer to read the book first. So if the movies are never better than the books, why are so many books made into movies?

    ReplyDelete

Comments